Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
2.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 69, 2023 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2284552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota alterations have been reported in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with reduced alpha diversity and altered microbiota composition related to respiratory failure. However, data regarding gut microbiota and mortality are scarce. METHODS: Rectal swabs for gut microbiota analyses were collected within 48 h after hospital admission (baseline; n = 123) and three-month post-admission (n = 50) in a subset of patients included in the Norwegian SARS-CoV2 cohort study. Samples were analysed by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. Gut microbiota diversity and composition at baseline were assessed in relation to need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission during hospitalization. The primary objective was to investigate whether the ICU-related gut microbiota was associated with 60-day mortality. RESULTS: Gut microbiota diversity (Shannon index) at baseline was lower in COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission during hospitalization than in those managed in general wards. A dysbiosis index representing a balance of enriched and reduced taxa in ICU compared with ward patients, including decreased abundance of butyrate-producing microbes and enrichment of a partly oral bacterial flora, was associated with need of ICU admission independent of antibiotic use, dexamethasone use, chronic pulmonary disease, PO2/FiO2 ratio, C-reactive protein, neutrophil counts or creatinine levels (adjusted p < 0.001). The ICU-related dysbiosis index at baseline correlated with systemic inflammation and was associated with 60-day mortality in univariate analyses (Hazard ratio 3.70 [2.00-8.6], p < 0.001), as well as after separate adjustment for covariates. At the three-month follow-up, the dysbiosis index remained elevated in ICU patients compared with ward patients (adjusted p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Although our data should be regarded as exploratory due to low number of clinical end points, they suggest that gut microbiota alterations during hospitalization could be related to poor prognosis after severe COVID-19. Larger studies of gut involvement during COVID-19 in relation to long-term clinical outcome are warranted. Trial registration NCT04381819 . Retrospectively registered May 11, 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Cohort Studies , Dysbiosis/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Hospitalization
3.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 9, 2023 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2196397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib has shown efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but no placebo-controlled trials have focused specifically on severe/critical COVID, including vaccinated participants. METHODS: Bari-SolidAct is a phase-3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling participants from June 3, 2021 to March 7, 2022, stopped prematurely for external evidence. Patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were randomised to Baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo, added to standard of care. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 60 days. Participants were remotely followed to day 90 for safety and patient related outcome measures. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were screened, 284 randomised, and 275 received study drug or placebo and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analyses (139 receiving baricitinib and 136 placebo). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years, 77% were male and 35% had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. There were 21 deaths at day 60 in each group, 15.1% in the baricitinib group and 15.4% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference and 95% CI - 0.1% [- 8·3 to 8·0]). In sensitivity analysis censoring observations after drug discontinuation or rescue therapy (tocilizumab/increased steroid dose), proportions of death were 5.8% versus 8.8% (- 3.2% [- 9.0 to 2.7]), respectively. There were 148 serious adverse events in 46 participants (33.1%) receiving baricitinib and 155 in 51 participants (37.5%) receiving placebo. In subgroup analyses, there was a potential interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on 60-day mortality. In a subsequent post hoc analysis there was a significant interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on the occurrence of serious adverse events, with more respiratory complications and severe infections in vaccinated participants treated with baricitinib. Vaccinated participants were on average 11 years older, with more comorbidities. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial was prematurely stopped for external evidence and therefore underpowered to conclude on a potential survival benefit of baricitinib in severe/critical COVID-19. We observed a possible safety signal in vaccinated participants, who were older with more comorbidities. Although based on a post-hoc analysis, these findings warrant further investigation in other trials and real-world studies. Trial registration Bari-SolidAct is registered at NCT04891133 (registered May 18, 2021) and EUClinicalTrials.eu ( 2022-500385-99-00 ).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Female , SARS-CoV-2 , RNA, Viral , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Double-Blind Method
4.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 28(1): 66, 2020 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2098371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a need for validated clinical risk scores to identify patients at risk of severe disease and to guide decision-making during the covid-19 pandemic. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is widely used in emergency medicine, but so far, no studies have evaluated its use in patients with covid-19. We aimed to study the performance of NEWS2 and compare commonly used clinical risk stratification tools at admission to predict risk of severe disease and in-hospital mortality in patients with covid-19. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in a public non-university general hospital in the Oslo area, Norway, including a cohort of all 66 patients hospitalised with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from the start of the pandemic; 13 who died during hospital stay and 53 who were discharged alive. Data were collected consecutively from March 9th to April 27th 2020. The main outcome was the ability of the NEWS2 score and other clinical risk scores at emergency department admission to predict severe disease and in-hospital mortality in covid-19 patients. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for NEWS2 scores ≥5 and ≥ 6, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score ≥ 2, ≥2 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and CRB-65 score ≥ 2. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for the clinical risk scores were compared using DeLong's test. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients (mean age 67.9 years) were included. Of these, 23% developed severe disease. In-hospital mortality was 20%. Tachypnoea, hypoxemia and confusion at admission were more common in patients developing severe disease. A NEWS2 score ≥ 6 at admission predicted severe disease with 80.0% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.822, 95% CI 0.690-0.953). NEWS2 was superior to qSOFA score ≥ 2 (AUC 0.624, 95% CI 0.446-0.810, p < 0.05) and other clinical risk scores for this purpose. CONCLUSION: NEWS2 score at hospital admission predicted severe disease and in-hospital mortality, and was superior to other widely used clinical risk scores in patients with covid-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Early Warning Score , Hospital Mortality , Patient Admission , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Pandemics , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
6.
J Intern Med ; 292(5): 816-828, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2001700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: T-cell activation is associated with an adverse outcome in COVID-19, but whether T-cell activation and exhaustion relate to persistent respiratory dysfunction and death is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether T-cell activation and exhaustion persist and are associated with prolonged respiratory dysfunction and death after hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: Plasma and serum from two Norwegian cohorts of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (n = 414) were analyzed for soluble (s) markers of T-cell activation (sCD25) and exhaustion (sTim-3) during hospitalization and follow-up. RESULTS: Both markers were strongly associated with acute respiratory failure, but only sTim-3 was independently associated with 60-day mortality. Levels of sTim-3 remained elevated 3 and 12 months after hospitalization and were associated with pulmonary radiological pathology after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest prolonged T-cell exhaustion is an important immunological sequela, potentially related to long-term outcomes after severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocytes
7.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 54(12): 918-923, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1997035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lungs are the organ most likely to sustain serious injury from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the mechanisms for long-term complications are not clear. Patients with severe COVID-19 have shorter telomere lengths and higher levels of cellular senescence, and we hypothesized that circulating levels of the telomere-associated senescence markers chitotriosidase, ß-galactosidase, cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide and stathmin 1 (STMN1) were elevated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to controls and could be associated with pulmonary sequelae following hospitalization. METHODS: Ninety-seven hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent assessment for pulmonary sequelae at three-month follow-up were included in the study. ß-Galactosidase and chitotriosidase were analysed by fluorescence; stathmin 1 and cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide were analysed by enzyme immuno-assay in plasma samples from the acute phase and after three-months. In addition, the classical senescence markers cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A and 2A were analysed by enzyme immuno-assay in peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysate after three months. RESULTS: We found elevated plasma levels of the senescence markers chitotriosidase and stathmin 1 in patients three months after hospitalization with COVID-19, and these markers in addition to protein levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A in cell lysate, were associated with pulmonary pathology. The elevated levels of these markers seem to reflect both age-dependent (chitotriosidase) and age-independent (stathmin 1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) processes. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that accelerated ageing or senescence could be important for long-term pulmonary complications of COVID-19, and our findings may be relevant for future research exploring the pathophysiology and management of these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Stathmin , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Cellular Senescence/physiology , beta-Galactosidase/metabolism , Biomarkers , Disease Progression , Cyclin-Dependent Kinases
8.
J Infect Dis ; 2022 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1961059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune dysregulation is a major factor in the development of severe Covid-19. The homeostatic chemokines CCL19 and CCL21 have been implicated as mediators of tissue inflammation, but data on their regulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection is limited. We thus investigated the levels of these chemokines in Covid-19 patients. METHODS: Serial blood samples were obtained from patients hospitalized with Covid-19 (n = 414). Circulating CCL19 and CCL21 levels during hospitalization and three-month follow-up were analyzed. In vitro assays and analysis of RNAseq data from public repositories were performed to further explore possible regulatory mechanisms. RESULTS: A consistent increase in circulating levels of CCL19 and CCL21 was observed, with high levels correlating with disease severity measures, including respiratory failure, need for intensive care, and 60-day all-cause mortality. High levels of CCL21 at admission were associated with persisting impairment of pulmonary function at the three-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight CCL19 and CCL21 as markers of immune dysregulation in Covid-19. This may reflect aberrant regulation triggered by tissue inflammation, as observed in other chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Determination of the source and regulation of these chemokines and their effects on lung tissue is warranted to further clarify their role in Covid-19.

9.
J Infect ; 85(1): 57-63, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851543

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and characteristics of superinfections in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, and the impact of dexamethasone as standard therapy. METHODS: This multicentre, observational, retrospective study included patients ≥ 18 years admitted from March 1st 2020 to January 31st 2021 with COVID-19 infection who received mechanical ventilation. Patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, therapy and survival were examined. RESULTS: 155/156 patients (115 men, mean age 62 years, range 26-84 years) were included. 67 patients (43%) had 90 superinfections, pneumonia dominated (78%). Superinfections were associated with receiving dexamethasone (66% vs 32%, p<0.0001), autoimmune disease (18% vs 5.7%, p<0.016) and with longer ICU stays (26 vs 17 days, p<0,001). Invasive fungal infections were reported exclusively in dexamethasone-treated patients [8/67 (12%) vs 0/88 (0%), p<0.0001]. Unadjusted 90-day survival did not differ between patients with or without superinfections (64% vs 73%, p=0.25), but was lower in patients receiving dexamethasone versus not (58% vs 78%, p=0.007). In multiple regression analysis, superinfection was associated with dexamethasone use [OR 3.7 (1.80-7.61), p<0.001], pre-existing autoimmune disease [OR 3.82 (1.13-12.9), p=0.031] and length of ICU stay [OR 1.05 p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill COVID-19 patients, dexamethasone as standard of care was strongly and independently associated with superinfections.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Superinfection , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Autoimmune Diseases/etiology , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Superinfection/etiology
10.
J Intern Med ; 291(6): 801-812, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory infection, mounting evidence suggests that the gastrointestinal tract is involved in the disease, with gut barrier dysfunction and gut microbiota alterations being related to disease severity. Whether these alterations persist and are related to long-term respiratory dysfunction remains unknown. METHODS: Plasma was collected during hospital admission and after 3 months from the NOR-Solidarity trial (n = 181) and analyzed for markers of gut barrier dysfunction and inflammation. At the 3-month follow-up, pulmonary function was assessed by measuring the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO ). Rectal swabs for gut microbiota analyses were collected (n = 97) and analyzed by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. RESULTS: Gut microbiota diversity was reduced in COVID-19 patients with respiratory dysfunction, defined as DLCO below the lower limit of normal 3 months after hospitalization. These patients also had an altered global gut microbiota composition, with reduced relative abundance of 20 bacterial taxa and increased abundance of five taxa, including Veillonella, potentially linked to fibrosis. During hospitalization, increased plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) were strongly associated with respiratory failure, defined as pO2 /fiO2 (P/F ratio) <26.6 kPa. LBP levels remained elevated during and after hospitalization and were associated with low-grade inflammation and respiratory dysfunction after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Respiratory dysfunction after COVID-19 is associated with altered gut microbiota and persistently elevated LBP levels. Our results should be regarded as hypothesis generating, pointing to a potential gut-lung axis that should be further investigated in relation to long-term pulmonary dysfunction and long COVID.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , COVID-19/complications , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Inflammation , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
11.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 141(2)2022 02 01.
Article in English, Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1674940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article is to summarise the course of illness and treatment for patients with COVID-19 admitted to Bærum Hospital since the start of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We present data from a prospective observational study with the aim of systematising knowledge about patients admitted because of COVID-19. All patients admitted to Bærum Hospital up to and including 28 June 2021 were included. The results are presented for three waves of admissions: 9 March-23 June 2020, 21 September 2020-28 February 2021 and 1 March-28 June 2021. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients, divided into 77, 101 and 122 in the three waves respectively, were admitted because of COVID-19. The number of hospital deaths during the three waves was 14 (18 %), 11 (11 %) and 5 (4 %) respectively. The average age of the patients was 67.6 years in the first wave and 53.3 years in the third wave. Altogether 204 patients (68 %) received medical oxygen or ventilation support, and 31 of these (10 % of all the patients) received invasive ventilation support. Non-invasive ventilation support was used as the highest level of treatment in 4 (8 %), 9 (13 %) and 17 (20 %) patients with respiratory failure in the three waves respectively. In the second and third wave, 125 out of 152 patients with respiratory failure (82 %) were treated with dexamethasone. INTERPRETATION: Differences in patient characteristics and changes to treatment methods, such as the use of dexamethasone and non-invasive ventilation support, may have contributed to the apparent fall in mortality from the first to the third wave. Conditions that are not registered in the study, such as vaccination status, may also have impacted on mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Thrombosis Update ; : 100096, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1586296

ABSTRACT

Introduction The incidence of thromboembolism during COVID-19 and the use of thromboprophylaxis vary greatly between studies. Only a few studies have investigated the rate of thromboembolism post-discharge. This study determined the 90-day incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic complications, risk factors for venous thromboembolic events and characterized the use of thromboprophylaxis during and after hospitalization. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records for adult patients hospitalized for >24 hours for COVID-19 before May 15, 2020, in ten Norwegian hospitals. We extracted data on demographics, thromboembolic complications, thromboembolic risk factors, and the use of thromboprophylaxis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine risk factors for VTE. Results 550 patients were included. The 90-day incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients was 6.9% (95% CI: 5.1–9.3) overall and 13.8% in the ICU. Male sex (hazard ratio (HR) 7.44, 95% CI 1.73–32.02, p = 0.007) and previous VTE (HR 6.11, 95% CI: 1.74–21.39, p = 0.005) were associated with risk of VTE in multivariable analysis. Thromboprophylaxis was started in 334 patients (61%) with a median duration of 7 days (25th–75th percentile 3–13);in the VTE population 10/23 (43%) started thromboprophylaxis prior to diagnosis. After discharge 20/223 patients received extended thromboprophylaxis and 2/223 (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.3–1.9) had a thromboembolism. Conclusions The 90-day incidence of thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients was 7%, but <1% after discharge. Risk factors were male sex and previous VTE. Most patients received thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization, but only <10% after discharge.

13.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(9): 1261-1269, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1547664

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New treatment modalities are urgently needed for patients with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) Solidarity trial showed no effect of remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on mortality, but the antiviral effects of these drugs are not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of remdesivir and HCQ on all-cause, in-hospital mortality; the degree of respiratory failure and inflammation; and viral clearance in the oropharynx. DESIGN: NOR-Solidarity is an independent, add-on, randomized controlled trial to the WHO Solidarity trial that included biobanking and 3 months of clinical follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04321616). SETTING: 23 hospitals in Norway. PATIENTS: Eligible patients were adults hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERVENTION: Between 28 March and 4 October 2020, a total of 185 patients were randomly assigned and 181 were included in the full analysis set. Patients received remdesivir (n = 42), HCQ (n = 52), or standard of care (SoC) (n = 87). MEASUREMENTS: In addition to the primary end point of WHO Solidarity, study-specific outcomes were viral clearance in oropharyngeal specimens, the degree of respiratory failure, and inflammatory variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in mortality during hospitalization. There was a marked decrease in SARS-CoV-2 load in the oropharynx during the first week overall, with similar decreases and 10-day viral loads among the remdesivir, HCQ, and SoC groups. Remdesivir and HCQ did not affect the degree of respiratory failure or inflammatory variables in plasma or serum. The lack of antiviral effect was not associated with symptom duration, level of viral load, degree of inflammation, or presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at hospital admittance. LIMITATION: The trial had no placebo group. CONCLUSION: Neither remdesivir nor HCQ affected viral clearance in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Clinical Therapy Research in the Specialist Health Services, Norway.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19/virology , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Viral Load/drug effects , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Cause of Death , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Inflammation/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Oropharynx/virology , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Standard of Care , Treatment Outcome
17.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 140(11)2020 08 18.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-724685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The course of disease, complications and hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 admitted to Norwegian hospitals has not been widely described. The purpose of this study was to survey patients with COVID-19 admitted to a local hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The data were retrieved from a prospective observational study of all patients admitted with COVID-19 to Bærum Hospital since the start of the coronavirus outbreak. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients with COVID-19 admitted in the period 9 March 2020-7 May 2020 were included. The mean age was 67.9 years, and 43 patients (59 %) were men. The average number of days hospitalised was 10.1. Altogether 19 patients (26 %) had a very severe course of disease, and 14 (19 %) died during their stay in hospital. The mean age among the patients who died was 79.5 years. A total of 49 patients (67 %) had hypoxaemia and required oxygen therapy for an average of 10.1 days. Of these, 9 patients were given invasive respiratory support for a median 18 days. Symptoms of delirium occurred in 26 patients (36 %) and was the most frequent non-respiratory complication. INTERPRETATION: The majority of the patients hospitalised with COVID-19 needed prolonged oxygen therapy, and there was a high incidence of severe complications.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 140(8)2020 05 26.
Article in English, Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-431229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emerging reports indicate a high incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalised for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during the spring 2020 pandemic. The pronounced pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses observed in these patients may contribute to a transient hypercoagulable state. In this setting, pulmonary embolism may cause further respiratory distress and clinical deterioration. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the clinical course of three patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection and respiratory distress, where pulmonary embolism was detected during the course of the hospitalisation. Two of the cases occurred despite early institution of standard dosage of low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis, and in one case, pulmonary embolism was diagnosed during the convalescent phase of an otherwise benign COVID-19 disease course. INTERPRETATION: These cases highlight the importance of awareness of the potentially increased incidence of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 disease. Further research is required to establish appropriate clinical management guidelines for prevention of thromboembolic complications in COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Venous Thromboembolism , Aged , Anticoagulants , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Venous Thromboembolism/complications
19.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 140(7)2020 05 05.
Article in English, Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-216815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak is presenting the health system with new challenges, and there is a great need for knowledge about symptoms, clinical findings and course of illness in patients admitted to Norwegian hospitals with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this observational qualitative study, all patients admitted to a Norwegian local hospital (Bærum Hospital) with proven COVID-19 infection were included consecutively from the start of the outbreak. We present here patient characteristics, symptoms, clinical findings, experience of using clinical scoring systems and course of illness based on data in medical records. RESULTS: In the period 9-31 March 2020, 42 patients, of whom 28 (67 %) were men, were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 infection. The median age was 72.5 years (range 30-95). Fever (79 %), reduced general condition (79 %), dyspnoea (69 %) and cough (67 %) were the most common symptoms. A total of nine patients (21 %) had a critical course of illness with treatment in the Intensive Care Department and/or death during their stay in hospital. Patients with a critical course had a higher average score on National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission (7.6 vs 3.3). Only one of the most severely ill patients scored ≥ 2 on the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) on admission. INTERPRETATION: Most patients admitted to our hospital with COVID-19 had a fever and respiratory tract symptoms. A high percentage of patients had a critical course of illness. A NEWS2 score of ≥ 5 on admission may be a useful aid in identifying patients at risk of a critical course of illness, while CRB-65 and qSOFA score ≥ 2 proved to be of little usefulness for this purpose in our material.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Critical Illness , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cough/etiology , Dyspnea/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Fever/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL